Here's where they often stuff up:
Overlooking the ATS
The primary stumbling block? Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS). A staggering 70% of CVs are thought to be sifted out by these digital gatekeepers at the first hurdle because they fail to align with the employer's selection criteria, marking the downfall of the one-size-fits-all CV.
The Generic CV Trap
Distributing the same CV for varied applications is a guaranteed misstep. Personalise your CV for each role, highlighting how your unique skills and experiences position you as the ideal candidate.
The 'obviously AI' application
Over-reliance on generative AI for job applications poses significant risks, particularly for senior executives. While AI can help craft polished applications, it often lacks the personal touch, depth, and cultural alignment that recruiters seek. This can result in generic, inconsistent responses that fail to stand out, undermining your authenticity and unique value. As companies refine their algorithms to detect AI-generated content, the dangers of blending into the crowd increase. To truly differentiate yourself, it’s essential to balance AI's efficiencies with your own strategic insights and genuine voice.
Incompatibility with Job Specifications
If your CV doesn't echo the skills and experience the job advert demands, chances are it'll be passed over. Ensure your CV meticulously matches the job requirements detailed in the employer's specification.
Overly Stylised CVs
Avoid overly stylised CVs that prioritise aesthetics over functionality. Laden with colours and complex layouts, these CVs often confuse Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS), rendering them fatally ineffective. Also, many organisations and jurisdictions will reject applications containing photographs to avoid accusations of gender or ethnicity bias.
To avoid the pitfalls and boost your chances of an interview, focus on devising a CV that's not just clear and concise but also bespoke for the job in question and compatible with ATS requirements.